Medical imaging tests help doctors diagnose diseases, from kidney stones and appendicitis to blockages in the coronary arteries and cancer.
But a recent wave of national news headlines say Americans may be having too many medical imaging procedures, exposing them to potentially harmful radiation.
So should you be concerned about screening or diagnostic tests?
“We always try to weigh the risks versus the benefits,” explains Talissa Altes, MD, a pediatric radiologist with UVA Children’s Hospital. “For patients who are having symptoms that something’s wrong, these tests are a way to diagnose and understand the problem. If your child has appendicitis, for example, the risk of injury from not detecting the appendicitis is much greater than the risk of having a CT scan. So these studies can be lifesaving.”
Daily Radiation Exposure
The culprit in certain medical imaging tests is “ionizing radiation,” a high-energy form of radiation that has the potential to damage DNA. Many medical imaging tests use radiation to create pictures of the inside of the body, including:
- X-rays
- Computed tomography (CT)
- Positron emission tomography (PET) scans
- Nuclear medicine studies
In very large doses, this type of radiation can increase a person’s risk of tissue damage, genetic malformations or cancer that may develop decades after exposure.
What most people don’t realize, however, is that they are exposed to low levels of this high frequency radiation every day. According to the American Cancer Society, the average person is exposed each year to about three mSv (millisieverts) of “background radiation” — radiation emitted from natural sources like radon (a natural gas) and cosmic rays from outer space and the sun.
“The amount of radiation from a chest X-ray, for example, is equivalent to a day or two’s worth of background radiation — it’s a tiny amount,” Altes says. “You get much more exposure by just living.”
Limiting Your Radiation Exposure
Even though the potential harm from medical testing is low, UVA radiologists are taking steps to minimize radiation exposure. UVA’s quality assurance program ensures that:
- Only the most up-to-date equipment is used
- The equipment is tested regularly by radiation physicists.
This modern equipment allows UVA’s radiologists to customize the amount of radiation for each patient by measuring their size, rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach.
Who’s Most at Risk from Radiation Exposure?
Children: Because children are still growing and developing, their body’s cells are undergoing rapid division, explains Altes. “These cells are most vulnerable to DNA damage and to becoming cancerous.” These effects aren’t likely to occur for 15 to 20 years after the X-ray exposure.
Obese patients: Larger patients need stronger doses of radiation to get a quality image, explains UVA electrophysiologist John Ferguson, MD. “For every six centimeters of soft tissue, you end up doubling the X-ray exposure,” he says.
Pregnant women: Radiation from medical imaging poses a slight risk of birth defects to the unborn child, particularly in early gestation. If an X-ray is absolutely necessary during pregnancy, UVA radiologists take special measures to protect the uterus and surrounding areas with a lead apron.
Weighing the Risks and Benefits
While the radiation from a single exposure to an X-ray is extremely low, there is concern about a person’s accumulated exposure to radiation over a lifetime.
For that reason, you should talk about your concerns about medical imaging tests with your doctors. Ask if there are non-radiation alternatives, such as ultrasounds or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), that could yield the same results.
For most patients, the benefits of medical imaging far outweigh the risks of radiation exposure.
Comparing e.g. a dental xray to background radiation is misleading
yes, xray exposure is accumulative, but please note that a simple dentist xray has many time the dose of a single day of background radiation
In fact the xray burst is only 1/50 of a second, but it is very intense
It is exactly the same as sitting in the shade for a whole day and you are fine, but 10 minutes at noon on a sunny day will give you a sunburn.
Xrays, radioactive gamma rays as well as visible light are exactly the same thing. The only difference is the wavelength.
There is no such thing as harmless xray. Use it when you have to obviously… Imagine a broken bone.
My problem is with the concept of taking an entire set (10 or more) of dental xrays every 6 month because the dental insurance insists on it.
There may be dental problems which cannot be detected in early stages otherwise, but I have plenty of personal evidence, that dental xrays DID NOT
detect anything prior a crown was done, yet the tooth had to be extracted a few month later.
The reason for dental xrays advocated by insurances is not early detection of problems but making sure that there are not multiple individuals defaruding the insurance by assuming the same name.
Worse still, dental xrays are taken by unqualified staff. My former dentist had staff so incompetent, that they had to take xrays of the same tooth 3 or 4 times before they got it right and placed the sensor in the correct spot.
My advice, NO xrays except when a compelling case can be made. Brush, floss, waterpick, and pay for your own dental bills.
In my case the insurance refused payment despite I had 21 xrays done in 3 years. They insisted I needed more xrays.
Thanks for sharing the useful information. Really loved your blog